CAULDER v. GOBER. No. 00-7107.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 4, 2000. Appeal from CVA, ___ Vet.App. ___; Opinion after remand 243 F.3d 558. Appeal Dismissed.
Articles Tagged: 251 F.3d 169
HICKS v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
HICKS v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. No. 00-3350.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. Appeal from MSPB. Affirmed.
DUQUE v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
DUQUE v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. No. 00-3193.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from MSPB. Affirmed.
KIMBROUGH v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
KIMBROUGH v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD. No. 00-3376.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from MSPB. Affirmed.
STERLING STRAT. SOL. v. RES. REWARD SYS., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
STERLING STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, INC. v. RESPONSE REWARD SYSTEMS, L.C.[†] No. 00-1376.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./S.D.Tex. Dismissed.
U.S. STEEL GROUP v. U.S., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
U.S. STEEL GROUP v. U.S. No. 00-1013.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from CIT. Dismissed. Page 170
JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. No. 00-3361.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. Appeal from MSPB. Affirmed.
TYPERIGHT KEYBOARD CORP. v. MICROSOFT CORP., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
TYPERIGHT KEYBOARD CORP. v. MICROSOFT CORP.[†] No. 00-1477.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 4, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./S.D.Cal. Appeal Dismissed.
JACKSON v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
JACKSON v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD. No. 00-3300.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from MSPB, 86 M.S.P.R. 40. Affirmed.
RAZOR USA, LLC v. ASA PRODUCTS, INC., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
RAZOR USA, LLC v. ASA PRODUCTS, INC.[†] No. 01-1100.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./C.D.Cal. Mandamus Denied.
ELK CORP. OF DALLAS v. GAF BLDG. MATERIALS, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
ELK CORP. OF DALLAS v. GAF BUILDING MATERIALS CORP.[†] No. 00-1306.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./N.D.Tex. Dismissed.
RAZOR v. ASA PRODUCTS, INC., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
RAZOR v. ASA PRODUCTS, INC.[†] No. 01-1099.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./C.D.Cal. Mandamus Denied.
SCOTT v. GOBER, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
SCOTT v. GOBER. No. 99-7197.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from CVA. Vacated.
PARKER v. GOBER, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
PARKER v. GOBER. No. 00-7008.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. Appeal from CVA. Appeal Withdrawn.
RESIDUAL ASSOCIATES, LLC v. U.S., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
RESIDUAL ASSOCIATES, LLC v. U.S. No. 00-5120.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from Fed.Cl., 46 Fed.Cl. 841; Vacating 251 F.3d 168. Appeal Reinstated.
HI-TEX, INC. v. SYNTHETIC FINISHERS, INC., 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
HI-TEX, INC. v. SYNTHETIC FINISHERS, INC.[†] No. 00-1229.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 5, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./E.D.Mich. Affirmed.[*] [*] Federal Circuit Rule 36.
SEARCY v. GOBER, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
SEARCY v. GOBER. No. 00-7071.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. Appeal from CVA. Affirmed.
KRUEGER v. GOBER, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
KRUEGER v. GOBER. No. 00-7156.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 4, 2000. Appeal from CVA. Mandamus Granted.
MOBIL CORP. v. ADVANCED ENVTL. RECY. TECH, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
MOBIL CORP. v. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.[†] No. 00-1081, 00-1096.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from D.Ct./D.Del.; Appealing after remand 92 F.3d 1203. Affirmed.[*] [*] Federal Circuit Rule 36.
IN RE TAYLOR, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
IN RE TAYLOR.[†] No. 00-1212.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 6, 2000. [†] Denotes patent appeals. Appeal from PTO. Affirmed.[*] [*] Federal Circuit Rule 36.