Selinda B. COSTA, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and Department of Justice, Intervenor. No. 2010-3054.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 13, 2010. Rehearing En Banc Denied November 19, 2010. Page 656 [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE […]
Category: Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions
SCHELL v. U.S., 589 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
William H. SCHELL and Ruby G. Schell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2009-5010.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 22, 2009. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims, Susan G. Braden, J. Page 1379 Thomas E. Redding, Redding Associates, P.C., of Houston, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief […]
FORT HOWARD PAPER CO. v. GULF STATES PAPER, 376 F.2d 904 (C.C.P.A. 1967)
FORT HOWARD PAPER COMPANY, Appellant, v. GULF STATES PAPER CORPORATION, Appellee. Patent Appeal No. 7797.United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. May 18, 1967. Page 905 Arthur L. Morsell, Curtis B. Morsell, Milwaukee, Wis., Arthur L. Morsell, for appellant. Raphael Semmes, Washington, D.C. (M. Mallet Prevost, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee. Before WORLEY, […]
HUMPHREY v. SHINSEKI, 413 Fed.Appx. 268 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
Phyllis A. HUMPHREY, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans, Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. No. 2010-7061.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 17, 2011. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 08-878, Judge Alan G. Lance, […]
STERN v. SCHROEDER, 36 F.2d 515 (C.C.P.A. 1929)
STERN et al. v. SCHROEDER et al. Patent Appeal No. 2160.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. December 19, 1929. Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals. Interference proceeding between Isaac Stern and another and Louis H. Schroeder and another. Decision for the latter, and the former appeal. Affirmed. See also 36 F.2d 518. Hans v. […]
CONSOLIDATED EDISON v. U.S., DEPT., ENERGY, 234 F.3d 642 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., New York Power Authority, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Arizona Public Service Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Energy Gulf States, Inc., Florida Power Corporation, Florida Power and Light Company, GPU Nuclear, Inc. (on behalf of Jersey Central Power Light Company, Metropolitan Edison […]
PAGE-RIVER-CURRAN v. UNITED STATES, 574 F.2d 1063 (Ct.Cl. 1978)
PAGE-RIVER-CURRAN, A JOINT VENTURE v. THE UNITED STATES. No. 566-71.United States Court of Claims. April 19, 1978. Page 1064 James J. Gallagher, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff; Gilbert A. Cuneo, Washington, D.C., attorney of record, Robert L. Ackerly, D. Joe Smith, Jr. and Sellers Conner Cuneo, Washington, D.C., of counsel. James F. Merow, Washington, D.C., with […]
APPLIED MATERIALS v. MULTIMETRIXS, 404 Fed.Appx. 493 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
William L. CAMPBELL, Jr., Claimant-Appellant APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. MULTIMETRIXS, LLC, Mark Kesel, Boris Kesil, and Elik Gershenzon Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 2010-1149, 2010-1150.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 9, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District […]
MURPHEY v. TPS ENTERPRISES, 296 Fed.Appx. 24 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
James D. MURPHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TPS ENTERPRISES, Patrick J. Simeri, Pier Simeri, Thomas L. Schoaf, Sr., Shirley A. Schoaf, Creative Products, Inc. and Adapto, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2008-1163.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 7, 2008. Page 25 [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United […]
IPVENTURE v. PROSTAR, 503 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
IPVENTURE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROSTAR COMPUTER, INC. and Midern Computer, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants. Nos. 2006-1012, 2006-1081.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 28, 2007. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dale S. Fischer, J. Page 1325 Richard M. Birnholz, Irell Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued […]
ARC PRODUCTS v. KELLY, 424 Fed.Appx. 944 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
ARC PRODUCTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, Patrick D. KELLY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2011-1122.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 25, 2011. Page 945 [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in case no. 10-CV-1248. Carol E. Jackson, Judge. Stephen […]
KASARJIAN v. PAULSON, 97 F.2d 474 (C.C.P.A. 1938)
KASARJIAN v. PAULSON. Patent Appeal No. 4019.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. June 27, 1938. Appeal from Board of Patent Appeals, Interference No. 68,369. Patent interference proceeding between Armen A. Kasarjian and George M. Paulson. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner […]
BALICK v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 85 F.3d 586 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
LAWRENCE F. BALICK, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. 93-3326United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED May 31, 1996 Page 587 Randall L. Shepard, Fitzsimmons and Shepard, of Rochester, Michigan, argued for petitioner. Steven E. Gordon, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C., argued for respondent. With […]
REFLECTONE, INC. v. DALTON, 60 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
REFLECTONE, INC., Appellant, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Appellee. No. 93-1373.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided July 26, 1995. Rehearing Denied September 27, 1995. Victor J. Zupa, Dickstein, Shapiro Morin, L.L.P., Washington, DC, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief were Brian J. Siebel and Ellen MacDonald, of counsel. […]
MALONEY v. SHINSEKI, 2011-7013 (Fed. Cir. 1-20-2011)
ROBERT F. MALONEY, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 2011-7013.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. January 20, 2011. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-2254, Chief Judge Bruce E. […]
STATE OF TEX. v. UNITED STATES, 537 F.2d 466 (Ct.Cl. 1976)
STATE OF TEXAS v. THE UNITED STATES. No. 374-73.United States Court of Claims. July 9, 1976. Robert H. Koehler, Washington, D.C., atty. of record, for plaintiff. Patton, Boggs Blow, Washington, D.C., John L. Hill and Elizabeth Levatino, Austin, Tex., of counsel. Thomas W. Petersen, Washington, D.C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen., Rex E. Lee, […]
GIOVE v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP., 230 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Salvatore GIOVE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. No. 99-3159.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided: October 31, 2000. Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board. Affirmed. Page 1334 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 1335 Jerre W. Dixon, Dixon […]
QUIGLEY v. ZIMMERMAN, 73 F.2d 499 (C.C.P.A. 1934)
QUIGLEY v. ZIMMERMAN et al. (three cases). QUIGLEY v. HUTTO. Patent Appeals Nos. 3322-3325.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. December 3, 1934. Page 500 Appeal from Board of Patent Appeals, Interference Nos. 59935, 60701, 63343, 63344. Separate interference proceedings between Thomas F. Quigley, junior party, and Marsden C. Hutto, senior party, and between Thomas F. […]
COLLINS v. GOBER, 251 F.3d 169 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
COLLINS v. GOBER. No. 00-7158.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 4, 2000. Appeal from CVA, ___ Vet.App. ___. Appeal Dismissed.
CRATER CORP. v. LUCENT TECH., 319 Fed.Appx. 900 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
CRATER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT T Company, Defendants-Appellees, and United States, Defendant. No. 2008-1289.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 2, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, No. 4.-98-CV-00913. […]