Category: Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

Application of METZNER. Patent Appeal No. 5359.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. November 29, 1947. Appeal from the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, Serial No. 433,915. Proceeding in the matter of the application of Albert W. Metzner for a patent. From a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming Primary Examiner’s […]

PARADISE CREATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UV SALES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-1283.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: January 3, 2003. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Kenneth L. Ryskamp, J. Page 1305 Elliot H. Scherker, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., of Miami, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Kyle B. Fleming, […]

In re HOWARD. Patent Appeal No. 2776.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. December 7, 1931. Appeal from Board of Patent Appeals. Application for patent by George E. Howard. From the decision rejecting the application, the applicant appeals. Reversed. Vernon M. Dorsey, of Washington, D.C. (S.F. Parham, of Washington, D.C., and L.G. Bates, of Hartford, Conn., […]

MAXUS ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. No. 93-5005.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 29, 1994. Page 1136 Thornton Hardie, III, Thompson Knight, Dallas, TX, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Charles Bricken, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were James A. Bruton, Acting Asst. […]

Tom J. KEARNS, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Oscar Eugene Kearns, Deceased v. The UNITED STATES. No. 165-65.United States Court of Claims. July 17, 1968. Page 227 Thomas A. Frazier, Jr., Washington, D.C., attorney of record, for plaintiff; Ivins, Phillips Barker, Washington, D.C., of counsel. William C. Ballard, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom was […]

CECILE GAGNON CO., Appellant, v. BOURJOIS, Inc., Appellee. Patent Appeal No. 6145.United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. June 15, 1955. Gould Wilkie, New York City (R.L. von Bernuth, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Page 732 Alexander, Maltitz, Derenberg Daniels, New York City (Joe E. Daniels and Walter J. Derenberg, New York […]

SCHWARTZ v. GRAENZ. Patent Appeal No. 3528.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. February 17, 1936. Page 768 Appeal from the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, Interference No. 64,375. Interference proceeding between Nathan Schwartz and Alfred Graenz. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office reversing […]

ADAMS et al. v. STULLER. Patent Appeal No. 3878.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. February 7, 1938. Appeal from Board of Patent Appeals, Interference No. 67,078. Interference proceeding between Francis E. Adams and another and Earl A. Stuller. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision […]

INTERCONNECT PLANNING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS E. FEIL, ROBERT O. CARPENTER, V BAND SYSTEMS, INC., AND TURRET EQUIPMENT CORP.,[*] DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal Nos. 84-1467, 85-565.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 9, 1985. [*] The complaint against Robert O. Carpenter and Turret Equipment Corp. was dismissed by stipulation, and they are not parties to this […]

Application of George V. ELTGROTH. Patent Appeal No. 8237.United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. January 8, 1970. George V. Eltgroth, pro se. Melvin M. Goldenberg, Arlington, Va., of counsel. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, ALMOND, BALDWIN, LANE, […]

CICENA LTD. AND CICENA, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. COLUMBIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. 90-1053.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 3, 1990. Page 1547 Richard Z. Lehv, Zelnick Lehrman, P.C., New York City, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Weiss Dawid Fross, Allan Zelnick, Stephen F. Mohr Glenn Mitchell. William J. Thomashower, […]

In re LINCOLN et al. Patent Appeal No. 4389.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. May 5, 1941. Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals, Serial No. 738,100. Proceeding in the matter of the application of Bert H. Lincoln and another for a patent. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States […]

In re TSCHOP. Patent Appeal No. 4818.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. December 7, 1943. Page 516 Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals, Serial No. 295,255. Proceeding in the matter of the application of Harry E. Tschop for a patent relating to nickel anodes. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the […]

SEARLE v. GLARUM et al. Patent Appeal No. 5632.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. April 6, 1948. Proceeding between Norman E. Searle and Sivert N. Glarum and another. From an adverse determination, the former appeals. On motion by appellant that costs of printing certain testimony and exhibits in the record be taxed against appellees. Motion […]